🔗 Share this article

Do your LinkedIn connections viewing you as a industry expert? Do numerous respondents praising your insights on growing your venture? Do recruiters reaching out to discuss opportunities?

If not, the explanation might be that you're not male.

The Experiment: Modifying Profile Gender to achieve Better Visibility

Numerous women participated in a collective professional network test recently following popular discussions suggested that changing their profile gender to "man" enhanced their network presence.

Other testers rewrote their professional summaries to include what they termed "bro-coded" language - inserting action-focused professional jargon like "propel", "revolutionize" and "expedite". Based on reports, their exposure also improved.

Systemic Preference Questions Raised

The engagement increase has caused some to wonder whether a built-in sexism in LinkedIn's algorithm favors men who employ professional networking terminology.

Like most major networking sites, LinkedIn utilizes an algorithm to decide which posts are shown to which users - boosting some while suppressing others.

Company Statement

In a recent blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the phenomenon but claimed it does not consider "personal characteristics" when determining content distribution. Instead, the company mentioned that "numerous factors" affect how posts are received.

Changing gender on your profile does not influence how your content appears in search or feed.

Individual Results

A social media consultant, who changed her pronouns to "he/him" and her profile name to "Simon E", described remarkable results.

"The statistics I'm observing show a 1,600% increase in visitor traffic and a 1,300% increase in impressions," she noted.

Another professional, a communications strategist, began experimenting after observing her reach decline substantially.

The Process

• Initially, she modified her gender to "man"
• Subsequently, she used AI tools to rewrite her professional summary using "male-coded" wording
• Lastly, she repurposed old posts with comparable "assertive" language

The result was immediate: a more than fourfold rise in visibility within seven days.

The Downside

Despite the success, Cornish expressed dissatisfaction with the method.

"Previously, my content were softer - concise and clever, but also friendly and relatable," she stated. "Now, the bro-coded version was assertive and self-assured - similar to a Caucasian man swaggering around."

She abandoned the test after one week, stating "Every day I persisted, and results got better, I became angrier."

Mixed Results

Some participants experienced positive results. One writer who modified both her gender to "man" and her race to "white" reported a reduction in reach and engagement.

"We understand there's systemic preference, but it's extremely difficult to understand how it functions in particular situations or the reasons behind it," she commented.

Broader Implications

These experiments coincide with ongoing conversations about LinkedIn's unique role as both a professional network and community site.

Recent changes in recent months have apparently caused female creators experiencing markedly lower exposure, leading to informal experiments where identical posts by men and women received vastly different audience engagement.

System Details

According to LinkedIn, the platform uses AI systems to categorize and spread content based on various elements, including what's shared and the member's career profile.

The company states it regularly evaluates its algorithms, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson suggested that current reductions in certain members' visibility might stem from higher volume due to more content on the platform.

Changing Landscape

As one participant noted, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be growing on the platform.

"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and polished," she remarked. "This is evolving. It's turning into increasingly competitive and unpredictable."