🔗 Share this article

Just two days prior to the NYC mayoral election, political analyst Michael Lange made a significant forecast – not just who would win overall, but precinct by precinct. Lange, a political analyst born and raised in New York City, has spent over a decade in left-leaning activism and has become something of a well-known figure recently for his deep dives into municipal statistics and voter surveys.

He released his highly detailed prediction map – which correctly forecast that the progressive candidate was victorious while failed to predict the independent candidate’s solid showing – on his newsletter, his platform. Lange possesses a talent for witty coinages. He pointed out, for instance, the split between the “commie corridor”, stretching from Park Slope to Bushwick to Astoria, where he predicted (accurately) that Mamdani would win by large leads, and the conservative-leaning zone on affluent parts of Manhattan. There, certain media outlets and financial newspapers outrank the mainstream paper” in audience and most voters favored Cuomo, campaigning as a conservative-courting independent.

Voting Day Trends and Unexpected Results

What was your night?

It was necessary since they were dropping around 200,000 votes into the system frequently! I felt somewhat anxious initially: The candidate was ahead the initial ballots by a dozen percentage points, but came two big batches of ballots added later and his lead went from 12 to 8%. I was worried.

Understand, there was a world in which election day went kind of poorly for Mamdani, where Cuomo would have essentially doubling his votes from the earlier contest. However Mamdani gained half a million supporters to his initial base, and this was critical why he won. He went out and massively expanded his support from the primary.

Coalition Building

How did the mayor-elect get those extra votes from?

He built the coalition that the left long aimed for: it’s multiracial, it’s young, tenants and individuals squeezed by affordability. He improved considerably with minority communities, everyday New Yorkers, relative to the earlier election. Plus he boosted his base of left-leaning activists, youthful radicals, and immigrant groups. He couldn’t have won without expanding his appeal.

He built the coalition that the left long aimed for: multiracial, youthful, tenants and residents struggling with costs

There were also some supporters of both candidates – is this significant?

It is a real thing, limited to Hispanic laborers, Asian communities and Islamic voters. Voters in ethnic enclaves that went for Trump previously went for the progressive now. But it’s not that he was gaining white working-class voters and Trump loyalists.

Turnout and Impact

One of the big stories of the election was the record participation. Who benefited?

Both sides. Turnout was much greater than I had expected. I thought it could go over 2 million, but it reached 2.3M – that is a lot of darn voters. Existed a decent opposition group, who were motivated, but the Mamdani base was equally driven, and that was enough to secure victory.

You forecasted he’d get over half the ballots. Is he on course for that?

Currently it appears he’s favored to get over half. He’s at just over 50% but there’s still probably 200K ballots left to report at that time. Thus I don’t think it’s definitive, but I think it’s likely, and I wish he does so afterwards none can claim the Republican was a disruptor.

Republican Collapse

The GOP candidate, the Republican candidate, is the other big story. His support completely collapsed.

He didn’t win any district in any borough. Not even one neighborhood in the borough, similar to an 88% Trump neighborhood. That truly was unexpected. Cuomo kept very white areas, affluent zones and very religiously Jewish areas, and plus gained many conservatives on Staten Island who had a strong turnout. I believe there was a lot of tactical voting by GOP voters. They were doing it before the former president tweeted his support for the candidate, but it assisted. It might have changed the outcome unless the winning alliance failed to expand.

The “Commie Corridor”

Regarding your often-discussed “commie corridor” – was support for the candidate overwhelming in those parts of Brooklyn and Queens?

In my view there was a little dilution of the progressive zone in certain places like neighborhoods that have older Caucasian residents. There, instance, the Greek landlords and residents supported the independent. Thus there was some opposition. However no, mostly the commie corridor is a key factor why Mamdani won – he scored between 77% and 83% in specific neighborhoods.

Jewish Voters

In the lead-up to the vote we reported on whether the candidate was making inroads with the community. Is there any suggestion that he did?

Exist areas with many non-religious and left-inclined voters – such as Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he performed strongly. But in the wealthy Jewish communities like the Manhattan area, his position on Israel was influential in those places. Likewise in the more middle-class Jewish areas including Queens neighborhoods, or Bronx areas – they favored the independent. Plus, you have Jewish immigrants from the former Soviet Union in southern Brooklyn, they were pretty staunchly supportive. So I don’t know if there were major surprises here, but he retained left-leaning areas and including sections of the another locale by big margins.

Long-Term Significance

Has Mamdani rewritten what the city represents in politics? Will the commie corridor serve as a springboard for leftwing candidates?

Yes, it’s no coincidence that key political leaders from progressives come from a few areas in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I believe that there will be more of that – candidates will emerge from these neighborhoods to be elevated nationally.

However I think that each urban center in the US can have similar progressive hubs. Cities are the epicenters of progressive influence in the nation – because youth reside there, tenancy is common and they represent locales where people are crushed by the disparities exist.